Governing Through Difference: Legal Pluralism and Conservation Justice in Lamalera

Dewi, Yustina Trihoni Nalesti Governing Through Difference: Legal Pluralism and Conservation Justice in Lamalera. Space and Culture, 00. 0-1. ISSN ISSN: 1206-3312 Online ISSN: 1552-8308

[img]
Preview
Text
Paper SAC Aur et.al.pdf

Download (1MB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
Turnitin SAC Aur et al.pdf

Download (1MB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
Korespondensi SAC.pdf

Download (3MB) | Preview

Abstract

Conservation policies often criminalize indigenous practices when state and global norms disregard local cosmologies. This study examines Lamalera, an indigenous whaling community in Indonesia, whose ancestral system Ola Nuâng Lefa Nué, a moral-ecological law regulating whale harvests, conflicts with national bans and international biodiversity regimes. The research identifies a normative and epistemic gap between technocratic conservation and customary law rooted in reciprocity and restraint. Using a critical qualitative case study with fieldwork (2023–2025), interviews, and legal hermeneutics, it analyzes how customary, Church, and state laws intersect within unequal power structures. Findings reveal that Indonesia’s conservation law embodies discriminatory legal pluralism. It recognizes custom only under state control. Yet Lamalera’s living law fulfills principles of sustainable commons governance. The study proposes inclusive legal mediation: co-management, recognition, and FPIC, to reconcile conservation and indigenous rights, showing that governing through difference offers a more just and sustainable path for marine biodiversity conservation.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: 300 Social Sciences
300 Social Sciences > 340 Law
300 Social Sciences > 340 Law > International Law
Divisions: Faculty of Law and Communication > Department of Law
Depositing User: Ms Trihoni Nalesti
Date Deposited: 27 Apr 2026 07:14
Last Modified: 27 Apr 2026 07:14
URI: http://repository.unika.ac.id/id/eprint/39758
Keywords: conservation justice, customary law, epistemic conflict, legal pluralism, marine governance

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item